Mon Mar 1, 2010 8:15 am
Feed (some) of My People!
Our Catholic Church holds that
there can be no interdenominational agreement on receiving the Eucharist
before full ecclesiastical unity is achieved. Too often, this is
equated with another matter, that of Eucharistic sharing, the act of
making the Eucharist accessible to individuals of other traditions who
are, by virtue of baptism, our brothers and sisters in the Body of
Christ, and who are present for the Eucharistic celebration, whether as
occasional visitors or as spouses of the nearly 50% of Catholics in
North America who have married across denominational lines.
This lack of Eucharistic sharing between believing and prepared Christians makes a mockery of the theology of sacrament which says a sacrament effects what it signifies. If the Eucharist is the ultimate sacrament of unity, should it not be allowed to effect that unity as well as signify it? Should it not be more generously shared with properly disposed persons of faith who by special circumstances find themselves at a Catholic liturgy and ask to share the Body and Blood of Jesus with this us? In asking this, do they not meet all the criteria specified in the 1993 Directory for the Application of Principles and Norms of Ecumenism, Article 131,as well as Canon 844, Article 4 of the Code of Canon Law - a law too often required to be obeyed, too seldom generously applied?
Must we continuously
tell such people of good faith that we are sorry but they cannot
receive, cannot be healed by the ultimate sacrament of healing, cannot
live the unity of their marriage at the Eucharistic banquet, cannot be
united with us (and we with them) by the ultimate sacrament of unity?
Must we wait until such unity is officially proclaimed before we offer
food to the hungry, drink to the thirsty?
If Jesus commands this in His memory who can make rules against it? A thought to pray about during Lent!
Comments