Sun Nov 15, 2009 4:44 pm
Sun Nov 15, 2009 4:44 pm
Posted at 07:29 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Tue Dec 1, 2009 12:56 pm
Investigate the InvestigationPosted at 07:48 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:01 pm
Posted at 07:51 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Fri Jan 1, 2010 8:41 am
"Behold, I make all things new!" (Revelation 21:5)
Posted at 08:08 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Fri Jan 15, 2010 10:30 am
Posted at 08:09 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Mental Reservation
Posted at 08:15 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Mon Mar 1, 2010 8:15 am
Feed (some) of My People!
Our Catholic Church holds that
there can be no interdenominational agreement on receiving the Eucharist
before full ecclesiastical unity is achieved. Too often, this is
equated with another matter, that of Eucharistic sharing, the act of
making the Eucharist accessible to individuals of other traditions who
are, by virtue of baptism, our brothers and sisters in the Body of
Christ, and who are present for the Eucharistic celebration, whether as
occasional visitors or as spouses of the nearly 50% of Catholics in
North America who have married across denominational lines.
This lack of Eucharistic sharing between believing and prepared Christians makes a mockery of the theology of sacrament which says a sacrament effects what it signifies. If the Eucharist is the ultimate sacrament of unity, should it not be allowed to effect that unity as well as signify it? Should it not be more generously shared with properly disposed persons of faith who by special circumstances find themselves at a Catholic liturgy and ask to share the Body and Blood of Jesus with this us? In asking this, do they not meet all the criteria specified in the 1993 Directory for the Application of Principles and Norms of Ecumenism, Article 131,as well as Canon 844, Article 4 of the Code of Canon Law - a law too often required to be obeyed, too seldom generously applied?
Must we continuously
tell such people of good faith that we are sorry but they cannot
receive, cannot be healed by the ultimate sacrament of healing, cannot
live the unity of their marriage at the Eucharistic banquet, cannot be
united with us (and we with them) by the ultimate sacrament of unity?
Must we wait until such unity is officially proclaimed before we offer
food to the hungry, drink to the thirsty?
If Jesus commands this in His memory who can make rules against it? A thought to pray about during Lent!
Posted at 08:21 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:33 am
Our Pope,
priests, and especially bishops, must remember that their chasuble is a
costume designed to project an image of power and authority
while disguising the humanity, warts and all, of the person inside. So
our Church institution, like all major corporations, projects an image
that intentionally covers human weaknesses and sometimes serious
blemishes just like pancake make-up.
Image is of all
importance. What corporation or religion seeks to project an image of
"Trying to be the one and only" or "Seeking truth"? Pride
drives compulsive "winners" to project an image of having arrived
at unattainable excellence instead of pursuing it like other mortals.
It is any wonder
that the "Sacred Magisterium" does not admit of error, change, or even
its shaded history, and demands secrecy in all matters revealing its
humanity? Don't blame loyal bishops for following orders to cover-up
all that distorts the "Image." They have been chosen for their absolute
commitment to protect and project the Church's holy bride of Christ
"Image" even if it entails great expense, suppression of conscience,
deception, unlawful secrecy, chicanery, or possible jail time.
Didn't Jesus use
every opportunity to point out such hypocrisy in the hierarchy of his
day, and in his own followers as well ? Was he not tempted as we to
seek power, control and adulation, offered by the prince of
pride? Jesus, the Son of Man like us, rejected these babbles of pride
and their source. Should we not expect to find a sincere effort to
avoid such hypocrisy among all who claim to be his followers?
An important 5th mark of the Church of Jesus (besides
One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic) is desperately needed - Humility
i.e. candid truthfulness clearly recognized by openness, accountability,
and the recognition that it is a human Church for humans. Without
humility, any institution including our Roman Catholic Church
structure, remains a secretive facade projecting divine attributes of
absolute truth, infallibility, complete trustworthiness - and guilty
of human pride.
But then, Lent is
the time to recognize why we can't cast the first stone.
"Pride precedes a fall" (Proverbs 16:18). True for all of us who make up the human Church.
Posted at 08:23 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:50 pm
Cry Out as if you had a Million Voices.
It is Silence that Kills the World. - Catherine of Siena
Occasional words of wisdom become staples for rational living. One example is from Lord Acton: Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. Another is from Edmund Burke, whom we can paraphrase slightly: All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing.
The time has come for us to declare that we have lost confidence in the hierarchical leadership of the Roman Catholic Church. This is a result of our recognition of the tsunami of corrupt behavior and secrecy that has resulted in systemic sexual abuse of young people by many clergy and religious. The perpetrators include the religious superiors, mainly bishops, who have enabled this to continue by covering up the criminal actions. It is obvious that the primary motivation of the leadership is to protect the presumed unsullied reputation of the institutional church, regardless of the consequences to mere human beings.
Therefore, we call for all clergy and religious, without exception, who have had personal knowledge of sexual abuse by others, and who did not take decisive action to stop it, to resign forthwith. In addition, we call for the immediate abolition of the requirement for an oath of unquestioning obedience and a vow of secrecy by clergy and religious to their superiors. Such an oath of blind obedience has no place in a collegial organization. A vow of secrecy is antithetical to a true Christian community. Such practices are at the heart of the corruption of the present institutional church.
Posted at 08:26 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)